<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Which newspaper mentions Twitter the most? (UK)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.140char.com/2009/10/which-newspaper-mentions-twitter-the-most-uk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.140char.com/2009/10/which-newspaper-mentions-twitter-the-most-uk/</link>
	<description>Microblogging news, tools and resources: Twitter, Google Buzz, Tumblr, Identi.ca, Yammer, Posterous</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:06:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Martin Belam</title>
		<link>http://www.140char.com/2009/10/which-newspaper-mentions-twitter-the-most-uk/comment-page-1/#comment-26520</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Belam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 00:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.140char.com/?p=723#comment-26520</guid>
		<description>It has been rightly pointed out to me that TelegraphTowers should be @telegraphoffers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has been rightly pointed out to me that TelegraphTowers should be @telegraphoffers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Thornton</title>
		<link>http://www.140char.com/2009/10/which-newspaper-mentions-twitter-the-most-uk/comment-page-1/#comment-26519</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Thornton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 23:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.140char.com/?p=723#comment-26519</guid>
		<description>See, I knew you&#039;d start applying more rigourous logic to the tracking! I&#039;ll definitely start looking at those pages, but the flaw will be if Twitter is mentioned in contexts other than technology - such as celebrity, or general news. Plus there&#039;s no handy number for a total of articles on those topic pages!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But there&#039;s definitely a lot of scope for improvement, as Jonathan and yourself have said - I&#039;ll be investigating better ways shortly as there seems to be some interest in the findings!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See, I knew you&#39;d start applying more rigourous logic to the tracking! I&#39;ll definitely start looking at those pages, but the flaw will be if Twitter is mentioned in contexts other than technology &#8211; such as celebrity, or general news. Plus there&#39;s no handy number for a total of articles on those topic pages!</p>
<p>But there&#39;s definitely a lot of scope for improvement, as Jonathan and yourself have said &#8211; I&#39;ll be investigating better ways shortly as there seems to be some interest in the findings!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Belam</title>
		<link>http://www.140char.com/2009/10/which-newspaper-mentions-twitter-the-most-uk/comment-page-1/#comment-26518</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Belam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 22:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.140char.com/?p=723#comment-26518</guid>
		<description>Hmm, I think you&#039;ll find there is a big difference between authored articles that mention Twitter, and HTML pages that have been indexed by a search engine that mention Twitter - for example in the first page of Telegraph results this page is listed - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.telegraph.co.uk/promotions/6415819/Food-offer-2-for-1-main-meals-at-Prezzo.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.telegraph.co.uk/promotions/6415819/F...&lt;/a&gt; - and the only mention of Twitter is a &#039;Sign up to our TelegraphTowers feed&#039; at the bottom. Likewise this Guardian URL is listed in our site search - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/datablog/2009/sep/18/uk-swine-flu-cases-data&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/datablog/2009/s...&lt;/a&gt; - but the only mention is in the generic &quot;• Get the A-Z of data • More at the Datastore directory • Follow us on Twitter&quot; in the foot of the article. You might get a better idea of frequency by comparing the rate at which stories are appearing on these two keyword / topic pages &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/twitter&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/twitter&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/twitter/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/twitter/&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, I think you&#39;ll find there is a big difference between authored articles that mention Twitter, and HTML pages that have been indexed by a search engine that mention Twitter &#8211; for example in the first page of Telegraph results this page is listed &#8211; <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/promotions/6415819/Food-offer-2-for-1-main-meals-at-Prezzo.html" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.telegraph.co.uk/promotions/6415819/Food-offer-2-for-1-main-meals-at-Prezzo.html?referer=');"></a><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/promotions/6415819/F.." rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.telegraph.co.uk/promotions/6415819/F..?referer=');">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/promotions/6415819/F..</a>. &#8211; and the only mention of Twitter is a &#39;Sign up to our TelegraphTowers feed&#39; at the bottom. Likewise this Guardian URL is listed in our site search &#8211; <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/datablog/2009/sep/18/uk-swine-flu-cases-data" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.guardian.co.uk/world/datablog/2009/sep/18/uk-swine-flu-cases-data?referer=');"></a><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/datablog/2009/s.." rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.guardian.co.uk/world/datablog/2009/s..?referer=');">http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/datablog/2009/s..</a>. &#8211; but the only mention is in the generic &#8220;• Get the A-Z of data • More at the Datastore directory • Follow us on Twitter&#8221; in the foot of the article. You might get a better idea of frequency by comparing the rate at which stories are appearing on these two keyword / topic pages <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/twitter" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.guardian.co.uk/technology/twitter?referer=');">http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/twitter</a> and <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/twitter/" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/twitter/?referer=');">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/twitter/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Hewett</title>
		<link>http://www.140char.com/2009/10/which-newspaper-mentions-twitter-the-most-uk/comment-page-1/#comment-26517</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Hewett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 21:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.140char.com/?p=723#comment-26517</guid>
		<description>Nice idea, although some of the site searches probably don&#039;t give the full picture (as you suggest with the Independent and Mirror). Might be interesting to compare with results using Nexis, for example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice idea, although some of the site searches probably don&#39;t give the full picture (as you suggest with the Independent and Mirror). Might be interesting to compare with results using Nexis, for example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
